{"id":2995,"date":"2026-10-13T15:33:06","date_gmt":"2026-10-14T03:33:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/footworklab.net\/?p=2995"},"modified":"2026-10-13T19:23:22","modified_gmt":"2026-10-14T07:23:22","slug":"digital-contour-scan-of-the-foot-explained","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/footworklab.net\/ar\/news\/2995\/","title":{"rendered":"What a 3D digital contour scan of the foot really measures, and what it does not"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"fwl-author\">\n<p><strong>About the author<\/strong> \u2014 FOOTWORK LAB is a manufacturer of foot<br \/>\nassessment equipment and custom orthotic insoles, based in Ruichang, Jiangxi Province, China.<br \/>\nFounded in 2014, with its own production plant since 2018. Certified to European Union and ISO<br \/>\nquality system standards. <a href=\"\/our-factory\/\">See the factory<\/a> or<br \/>\n<a href=\"\/certificate\/\">view certification<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p class=\"fwl-lead\"><strong>A 3D digital contour scan for the foot does not tell anyone what is<br \/>\nwrong.<\/strong> It measures. The scan records the shape of the foot, the profile of the arch and the<br \/>\ndistance from heel to toe, and it stores those values and images so they can be compared later.<br \/>\nReading those measurements, deciding what they mean for one person and choosing what to do next are<br \/>\nseparate judgements made by a qualified professional.<\/p>\n<p>Because &#8220;scanning&#8221; is used to describe several different measurements \u2014 contour shape, plantar<br \/>\npressure, lower-limb alignment and whole-body posture \u2014 buyers and clinicians sometimes assume one<br \/>\ndevice covers all of them, or that the measurements are interchangeable. They are not. This article<br \/>\nsets out what a contour scan actually captures, and where each of the neighbouring measurements<br \/>\nbegins and ends.<\/p>\n<h2>What a digital contour scan actually records<\/h2>\n<p>A contour scan is a geometric measurement. The device illuminates or images the underside and<br \/>\nsides of the foot, reconstructs its surface, and stores that surface as a set of coordinates. What<br \/>\nyou get is a digital model of the foot as it was presented during the scan \u2014 nothing more, and<br \/>\nnothing less.<\/p>\n<p>A contour scan is not a photograph and not a pressure mat. It is closer to a topographic map: the<br \/>\ndevice builds a three-dimensional representation of the foot&#8217;s surface, and every point on that<br \/>\nsurface carries a position. Because the output is geometric, it can be measured, aligned and<br \/>\ncompared in ways a picture cannot, and it can be handed to a design or manufacturing process as the<br \/>\nstarting point rather than merely as an illustration.<\/p>\n<p>That model is useful precisely because it is stable. Two scans taken weeks apart on the same<br \/>\nperson can be overlaid to see whether the surface has changed. The same file can be sent to a<br \/>\nworkshop, imported into a design tool and used as the starting point for a custom insole or a<br \/>\nfootwear last. The value is in the repeatability of the geometry, not in any conclusion drawn from<br \/>\nit.<\/p>\n<p>Three things follow from that definition, and they are worth stating plainly for anyone new to<br \/>\nthe category:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>The scan measures shape, not load.<\/strong> It says where the surface is, not how much<br \/>\nforce passes through any part of it.<\/li>\n<li><strong>The scan measures a moment, not a movement.<\/strong> A contour capture describes the<br \/>\nfoot in one position. Walking and running are quite different measurements.<\/li>\n<li><strong>The scan produces a record, not a reading.<\/strong> Output is a measurement set and an<br \/>\nimage. Interpretation is a separate act performed by a person.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Anyone who describes a contour scan as if it already contains the conclusion is describing the<br \/>\nwork of the clinician as if it were a feature of the machine. In practice the machine stops at the<br \/>\nmeasurement, and the professional begins there.<\/p>\n<h2>Foot geometry: length, width and the shape between them<\/h2>\n<p>The most familiar output of a contour scan is dimensional. Heel-to-toe length and the width across<br \/>\nthe ball of the foot are the two numbers most people expect, and for a footwear or insole workflow<br \/>\nthey are often the most immediately useful, because they map directly onto sizing.<\/p>\n<p>But a contour scan records far more than two numbers. The full surface capture carries the<br \/>\nrelationship between those dimensions \u2014 how the width narrows toward the heel, how the forefoot<br \/>\nspreads, how the outline curves. That shape is what makes the file usable for design rather than<br \/>\nmerely for sizing. Two feet with the same length and width can have quite different outlines, and it<br \/>\nis the outline the workshop actually works from.<\/p>\n<h3>Why the shape between the dimensions matters<\/h3>\n<p>When the captured geometry is passed to an insole or footwear process, what is used is not a size<br \/>\nlabel but a surface. A design tool needs the whole contour to position a support, to decide how much<br \/>\nmaterial sits under each region, and to allow for the way the foot sits inside a shoe. A pair of<br \/>\ndimensions cannot carry that information; a surface model can.<\/p>\n<p>This is also why a scan is more useful than a manual measurement when a design has to be<br \/>\nreproduced. A tracing or a set of dimensions captures part of the picture; a surface model captures<br \/>\nthe whole of the underside, and a designer can work from it later without the foot being present<br \/>\nagain. In a workshop that builds pairs to order, that difference shows up every working day.<\/p>\n<h3>Static geometry and the moving foot<\/h3>\n<p>It is worth remembering that a contour scan captures the foot in the position it was placed. That<br \/>\nmakes the measurement comparable between visits and straightforward to archive, which is exactly<br \/>\nwhat a workshop needs. It also means the capture describes geometry, and only geometry \u2014 it makes no<br \/>\nclaim about how the foot behaves once a person stands, walks or runs.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/footworklab.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/782f1c7e4fe436fdb4ec3e162c2b3378.jpg\" alt=\"Foot assessment equipment in use \u2014 F2\" loading=\"lazy\" title=\"\"><figcaption>FOOTWORK LAB F2. Measurement data only \u2014 clinical interpretation remains a professional judgement.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<h2>Arch profile, read as a curve rather than a verdict<\/h2>\n<p>The arch is where contour scanning is most often misunderstood. A scan can describe the medial<br \/>\nprofile of the foot \u2014 the curve between the heel and the ball \u2014 accurately and repeatably, and it<br \/>\ncan store that profile as part of the surface model. What it cannot do is attach a meaning to it.<\/p>\n<p>Terms such as flat feet, high arch or overpronation describe presentations that a clinician<br \/>\ninterprets in context: history, symptoms, activity, footwear and the rest of the lower limb. The<br \/>\nscan contributes one view of the geometry. It does not produce the interpretation, and it should not<br \/>\nbe presented as though it does.<\/p>\n<p>In a working clinic the arch profile is most valuable as a comparison tool. Capturing the same<br \/>\nfoot the same way at intervals lets a professional see whether the measured geometry has shifted,<br \/>\nand discuss that with the person in front of them. The measurement supports the conversation; it<br \/>\ndoes not replace it.<\/p>\n<p>It also helps to be careful with language when reporting. A profile can be described as flatter or<br \/>\nhigher than a previous capture; that is a statement about geometry. Saying a foot &#8220;needs&#8221; a<br \/>\nparticular support is a different kind of statement, and it belongs to the clinician&#8217;s reasoning<br \/>\nrather than to the scan. Keeping the two apart in how the software labels its output makes the<br \/>\nboundary visible to everyone who reads a report.<\/p>\n<h3>What the profile is used for downstream<\/h3>\n<p>For an orthotic workshop, the arch profile is where design decisions begin. The captured curve<br \/>\ntells the designer where the foot&#8217;s surface sits, and the design then has to work with that surface<br \/>\nto distribute load sensibly. This is a design task carried out by a trained person using the<br \/>\nmeasurement \u2014 not a step the scanner performs on its own.<\/p>\n<h2>Where contour scanning stops and pressure measurement begins<\/h2>\n<p>Contour scanning and plantar pressure measurement are frequently bundled into the same product,<br \/>\nwhich is convenient but can blur the boundary between them. They answer different questions.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Contour scanning<\/strong> answers &#8220;what shape is this foot?&#8221; It records geometry and<br \/>\nsurface.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Plantar pressure measurement<\/strong> answers &#8220;where does load go?&#8221; It records the<br \/>\ndistribution of force under the foot, either while standing still (static) or during movement<br \/>\n(dynamic).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>A pressure measurement produces a map of load and a path traced by the centre of pressure (COP) as<br \/>\na person moves. A contour scan produces a surface. Neither one substitutes for the other: a foot can<br \/>\nhave a pronounced arch and still show an unusual load pattern, and the two facts sit side by side in<br \/>\nan assessment rather than replacing one another.<\/p>\n<h3>Static and dynamic are separate captures<\/h3>\n<p>Within pressure measurement, static and dynamic studies are not the same test. A static capture<br \/>\nshows load distribution in a standing position; a dynamic capture shows it during a gait cycle, with<br \/>\nits stance and swing phases. Devices that support both are usually measured against different<br \/>\nworkflows, and a buyer should expect the two to be described separately.<\/p>\n<p>The practical point for anyone specifying equipment is to be precise about which measurement the<br \/>\nworkflow depends on. If the goal is geometry for a design file, a contour scan is the relevant<br \/>\ncapability. If the goal is to observe load during movement, that is a pressure measurement, and it<br \/>\ncarries different requirements for space and setup.<\/p>\n<p>It is worth asking how each measurement is presented in the report, too. A geometry view and a<br \/>\nload map are read differently by a clinician, and a buyer comparing devices should expect both to be<br \/>\ndescribed clearly rather than folded together under a single summary. The clearer the separation in<br \/>\nthe software, the easier it is to train a team to use it consistently.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/footworklab.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/e484350cea6a1cdfe03a9f1481824824.jpg\" alt=\"Foot assessment equipment in use \u2014 F2\" loading=\"lazy\" title=\"\"><figcaption>FOOTWORK LAB F2. Measurement data only \u2014 clinical interpretation remains a professional judgement.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<h2>Force-line alignment and posture capture are separate instruments<\/h2>\n<p>Two further measurements are often mentioned alongside scanning, and both deserve to be kept<br \/>\ndistinct from it.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Force-line alignment<\/strong> describes how the leg and ankle sit relative to the foot, so<br \/>\nthat the direction of load through the limb can be characterised. It is captured by imaging or<br \/>\nmeasuring the lower limb, not by contour scanning the sole. A device may support this, but it is a<br \/>\ndifferent measurement from the one that produces the surface model.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Posture capture<\/strong> steps back further and describes how the body is balanced over<br \/>\nthe feet, using camera-based vision to look at the whole standing figure. Again, this is not contour<br \/>\nscanning. It answers a question about the body&#8217;s overall alignment, and it produces its own images<br \/>\nand measurements.<\/p>\n<h3>Why the boundaries matter in practice<\/h3>\n<p>When a device is described as doing &#8220;everything&#8221;, the useful follow-up question is which of these<br \/>\nmeasurements it actually produces, and how each is reported. A clinic that needs geometry for<br \/>\ninsole design, pressure data during gait and a posture view is describing three requirements. They<br \/>\nmay be met by one platform or by several devices, but they should be specified separately rather<br \/>\nthan assumed.<\/p>\n<p>There is a practical reason to keep these straight during a purchase conversation. A supplier who<br \/>\ncan say that a device produces geometry and pressure, while alignment needs a separate capture, is<br \/>\ndescribing real capability. A supplier who claims all four from one capture is either describing a<br \/>\nlarger platform than the sentence suggests, or overstating what the machine does. Either way, the<br \/>\nboundary is the thing to pin down.<\/p>\n<h2>Why the output is a measurement, not a diagnosis<\/h2>\n<p>Everything above points to one conclusion, and it is the point we would make most firmly. A<br \/>\ncontour scan produces measurements and images. It does not produce a diagnosis, and it does not<br \/>\ndecide what should happen next.<\/p>\n<p>That is not a limitation to be worked around; it is how the equipment is designed to be used.<br \/>\nClinical interpretation and any decision about care remain the responsibility of a qualified<br \/>\nprofessional. A scanner that helps a practitioner capture repeatable geometry, compare visits and<br \/>\nbuild a design file is doing its job well. A scanner marketed as though it delivers the conclusion<br \/>\nis being described as something it is not.<\/p>\n<p>We hold to the same position about our own products. Our equipment records measurements and<br \/>\nimages; it does not diagnose, and we do not present it as though it could. Where a person presents<br \/>\nwith flat feet or another presentation, the device&#8217;s contribution is the measurement, and the<br \/>\nreading of it belongs to the clinician. Stating that boundary clearly is part of the value we offer,<br \/>\nnot a caveat attached to it.<\/p>\n<p>There is an obvious commercial temptation to blur that line, because a device that appears to<br \/>\ndeliver a verdict sounds more valuable than one that delivers a file. We think the opposite holds. A<br \/>\ntool whose limits are clear is easier to trust and easier to use well, and the professional who<br \/>\nreads it is not replaced by it. The measurement is the machine&#8217;s job; the meaning belongs to the<br \/>\npractitioner.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/footworklab.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/06a509379f12dc750925c186e85e12d4.jpg\" alt=\"Foot assessment equipment in use \u2014 F2\" loading=\"lazy\" title=\"\"><figcaption>FOOTWORK LAB F2. Measurement data only \u2014 clinical interpretation remains a professional judgement.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<h2>Frequently asked questions<\/h2>\n<div class=\"fwl-faq\">\n<h3>Is a contour scan the same as a pressure measurement?<\/h3>\n<p>No. A contour scan records the shape of the foot as a surface. A pressure measurement records how<br \/>\nload is distributed under the foot, either while standing still or during movement. The two are<br \/>\noften offered on the same device, but they measure different things and should be specified<br \/>\nseparately.<\/p>\n<h3>Does the scan tell you which insole a person needs?<\/h3>\n<p>No. The scan provides the geometry that a designer works from, but the decision about what to<br \/>\ndesign and who it is suitable for is a professional judgement. The equipment supplies the<br \/>\nmeasurement; the interpretation is made by a qualified person.<\/p>\n<h3>Can a contour scan show the arch clearly?<\/h3>\n<p>It records the medial profile of the foot accurately and repeatably, and that profile becomes part<br \/>\nof the surface model. Terms such as flat feet or overpronation are interpretations of that geometry<br \/>\nin context, and they are made by a clinician rather than by the device.<\/p>\n<h3>Does the capture change if the foot is moving?<\/h3>\n<p>A contour capture describes the foot in the position it was placed. Movement is a different<br \/>\nmeasurement, usually handled by pressure equipment during a gait cycle. If your workflow depends on<br \/>\nmovement, that requirement should be specified separately from geometry capture.<\/p>\n<h3>Who owns the scan data?<\/h3>\n<p>The data is generated for your practice, and how it is stored and exported is a workflow question<br \/>\nworth settling before purchase. Ask whether the captured geometry can be exported in a form your<br \/>\ndesign or production process accepts, and whether the software stores files locally or on the<br \/>\nmanufacturer&#8217;s system.<\/p>\n<h3>Can the reporting software be adjusted to your workflow?<\/h3>\n<p>Because we develop our own software, custom report fields and layouts are possible. These are<br \/>\nquoted separately, because the scope varies substantially from one project to another.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<h2>What we would do next<\/h2>\n<p>If you are specifying a contour scanning workflow, start by naming the measurement the workflow<br \/>\ndepends on. Geometry for a design file is one requirement; load during movement is another; posture<br \/>\nis a third. Write them down separately, then check which device or platform meets each one, rather<br \/>\nthan accepting a single sentence that claims to cover all three.<\/p>\n<p>Our own approach is described in more detail on the <a href=\"\/core-technology\/\">core technology<br \/>\npage<\/a>, and the full range sits on the <a href=\"\/products\/\">products page<\/a>. If you send us the<br \/>\nmeasurements your setting actually relies on, we will tell you which configuration fits and which<br \/>\ncapabilities you can leave out. You can reach the team through the <a href=\"\/contact\/\">contact<br \/>\npage<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>If it helps, we are happy to go through it with you. Tell us which of the measurements your<br \/>\nroutine depends on and what you will do with the output, and we will map our range against those<br \/>\nrequirements \u2014 including the parts you can leave out. Clarity before the order is worth more than<br \/>\nreassurance after it.<\/p>\n<p class=\"fwl-note\"><em>This article is intended for professional and educational reference. It is<br \/>\nnot medical advice. Foot assessment equipment produces measurements and images; clinical<br \/>\ninterpretation and any decision about care remain the responsibility of a qualified professional.<br \/>\nCertification scope is limited to the documentation we hold: European Union certification and ISO<br \/>\nquality system certification.<\/em><\/p>\n<div class=\"fwl-related\">\n<h2>Related reading<\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"\/news\/2957\/\">Plantar pressure &amp; gait analysis: reading the data<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"\/news\/1249\/\">Gait analysis: what it can and cannot tell you<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"\/news\/2959\/\">3D foot scanner in the clinic: precision analysis for custom orthotics<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"\/f2-fmp-gait-scanner\/\">F2 \/ FMP gait and pressure scanner platform<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"\/x5-foot-scanner\/\">X5 foot scanner and posture capture system<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<p><script type=\"application\/ld+json\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@type\":\"FAQPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/footworklab.net\/digital-contour-scan-of-the-foot-explained\/#faqpage\",\"mainEntity\":[{\"@type\":\"Question\",\"name\":\"Is a contour scan the same as a pressure measurement?\",\"acceptedAnswer\":{\"@type\":\"Answer\",\"text\":\"No. A contour scan records the shape of the foot as a surface. A pressure measurement records how load is distributed under the foot, either while standing still or during movement. The two are often offered on the same device, but they measure different things and should be specified separately.\"}},{\"@type\":\"Question\",\"name\":\"Does the scan tell you which insole a person needs?\",\"acceptedAnswer\":{\"@type\":\"Answer\",\"text\":\"No. The scan provides the geometry that a designer works from, but the decision about what to design and who it is suitable for is a professional judgement. The equipment supplies the measurement; the interpretation is made by a qualified person.\"}},{\"@type\":\"Question\",\"name\":\"Can a contour scan show the arch clearly?\",\"acceptedAnswer\":{\"@type\":\"Answer\",\"text\":\"It records the medial profile of the foot accurately and repeatably, and that profile becomes part of the surface model. Terms such as flat feet or overpronation are interpretations of that geometry in context, and they are made by a clinician rather than by the device.\"}},{\"@type\":\"Question\",\"name\":\"Does the capture change if the foot is moving?\",\"acceptedAnswer\":{\"@type\":\"Answer\",\"text\":\"A contour capture describes the foot in the position it was placed. Movement is a different measurement, usually handled by pressure equipment during a gait cycle. If your workflow depends on movement, that requirement should be specified separately from geometry capture.\"}},{\"@type\":\"Question\",\"name\":\"Who owns the scan data?\",\"acceptedAnswer\":{\"@type\":\"Answer\",\"text\":\"The data is generated for your practice, and how it is stored and exported is a workflow question worth settling before purchase. Ask whether the captured geometry can be exported in a form your design or production process accepts, and whether the software stores files locally or on the manufacturer's system.\"}},{\"@type\":\"Question\",\"name\":\"Can the reporting software be adjusted to your workflow?\",\"acceptedAnswer\":{\"@type\":\"Answer\",\"text\":\"Because we develop our own software, custom report fields and layouts are possible. These are quoted separately, because the scope varies substantially from one project to another.\"}}]}<\/script><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>What a foot contour scan records, and where it ends: contour geometry versus plantar pressure, force-line alignment and posture capture.<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":3029,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"footnotes":""},"categories":[8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2995","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/footworklab.net\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2995","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/footworklab.net\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/footworklab.net\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/footworklab.net\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/footworklab.net\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2995"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/footworklab.net\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2995\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3064,"href":"https:\/\/footworklab.net\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2995\/revisions\/3064"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/footworklab.net\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3029"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/footworklab.net\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2995"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/footworklab.net\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2995"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/footworklab.net\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2995"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}